data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1ad0/c1ad04349c0aa26426b8bbf5c8a7fd1e05f5eec6" alt="Conglomerate Relationships Illustration"
Defining administrative relationships between the brands operated by a conglomerate.
When a subdomain is delegated to a 3rd party it enables them, as the delegate, to publish an assertion record to be discovered via the delegated domain. In the simplest case, the publishing and discovery of the assertion record, and any associated policies, is identical to if the original domain administer had published them. To clarify the use of the delegated domain, it may be useful to include in the assertion record and/or to any referenced policy documents describing the relationship between the delegator and delegate organizations.
Example: Consider the "marketing.company.domain" example discussed above. The 3rd party marketing agency may want to publish DRPF policy documents that govern the uses of the subdomain. They can simply publish a policy assertion record as a TXT RR at the FQDN targeted by the CNAME declaration to be discovered by a relying party.
To support this example, the 3rd party marketing agency delegate could publish an assertion record at the target FQDN (i.e. the domain to which the CNAME is pointing) along the lines of:
"domrel;childOf:marketing.domain;delegate:company.domain;policy:https://marketing.domain/policies.json"
In addition to specifying the parent administrative domain for the delegated FQDN, the above example identifies the administrative domain that delegated the subdomain. Noting that the publication of this assertion record and referenced policy documents are entirely under the control of the delegate, without delegator involvement.
Using a CNAME record to delegate subdomains enables an easy way to map queries to another target FQDN, but does introduce slightly more complexity to enable a relying party to discover and parse the relationships between the delegator and delegate (and any policies each would like to publish in service to the subdomain). While the delegating administrator maintains a level of control over the delegated subdomain by virtue of being in control of the CNAME declaration, the delegator does lose the ability to publish assertion records via the simple TXT RR method. And given that there are times when both the delagator and delegate want to apply appropriate policies, we need to introduce a new publishing and discovery method.
To accomplish this, in addition to the delegate being able to use the simple TXT RR method for publishing their assertion record, the delegator may also opt to publish their own assertion record as a TXT RR within an attribute leaf label associated with the subdomain that they've delegated. This would be accomplished as per RFC 8552) with the attribute leaf label being "_drpf" such that the delegating administrator would publish there assertion record to something like "_drpf.marketing.company.domain".
The ability to publish DRPF assertion records directly as a TXT RR to the CNAME target of the subdomain as well as to the "_drpf" attribute leaf, both the delegate and delegator may publish their own policies. Taken together provides the ability of a relying party to build a full picture of the relationship and authorized uses of the delegated subdomain.
"marketing.company.domain. CNAME company.marketing.domain."
"domrel;childOf:marketing.domain;delegatedTo:marketing.domain;policy:https://company.domain/policies.json"
"domrel;childOf:marketing.domain;delegateOf:company.domain;policy:https://marketing.domain/policies.json"
Once the administator of delegate subdomain publishes their policy assertion record as a DNS TXT RR, and the delegator publishes their assertion record to the attribute leaf domain label, it's up to the relying party to discover them. To do so, the relying party would go through the following steps: